Famous logos and the fonts behind them

A surprising number of the most recognisable logos in the world don’t use an off-the-shelf font at all. Custom lettering and heavily modified typefaces show up again and again, precisely because a truly distinctive wordmark is hard to build from a font anyone else can also buy.

Coca-Cola: hand-lettering from a 19th-century handwriting style

The Coca-Cola script isn’t set in any commercial typeface. It’s custom hand-lettering based on Spencerian script, a flowing, ornamental handwriting style that was widely taught in American business schools throughout the late 1800s. Adopted for the logo around 1886, that same script, lightly refined over the decades, is still recognisable as the same mark today, making it one of the longest-running pieces of consistent branding in the world.

Disney: styled after a signature, not a typeface

Disney’s wordmarkWordmarkA logo built entirely from a brand’s own name set in distinctive lettering, rather than a separate pictorial symbol or icon. is styled after Walt Disney’s own signature rather than built from any existing font, though the mark in use today is a stylised approximation redrawn by studio artists over the decades, not a literal trace of his own handwriting. It’s been adjusted multiple times since to stay legible at a wide range of sizes and across a huge range of merchandise, while deliberately keeping the loose, personal quality of a signature rather than smoothing it into something more mechanically consistent.

IBM: a bold slab serif and eight stripes

Designer Paul Rand redesigned IBM’s logo in 1972 around a confident, bold, geometric slab serif, then added the eight horizontal stripes running through the letters that became the mark’s defining feature. Rand’s own documented reasoning for the stripes was about speed, dynamism and visual cohesion with the bold letterforms, not the widely repeated but unconfirmed story that they were meant to make the logo harder to photocopy.

“

The photocopier story is popular. It just isn’t part of Rand’s own documented reasoning.

Spotify and Netflix: modified fonts built for the brand alone

Spotify’s brand typeface for years was Spotify Circular, a customised version of Circular, a geometric sans-serif from the Swiss foundry Lineto. In 2024 the company went a step further and replaced it with Spotify Mix, a bespoke family drawn with the Berlin foundry Dinamo, so the type is now genuinely its own rather than licensed. Netflix took a similar approach for its own broader brand typeface, Netflix Sans, a custom font used across the company’s interface and marketing even though its actual logo wordmark is separately hand-drawn rather than set directly in that font. Both companies chose the same underlying strategy: start from a solid, well-tested structure, then customise it enough that it can’t be closely replicated with a font anyone else can simply license.

Why so many brands go custom

A licensed, off-the-shelf font is available to any competitor with the same budget. A custom typeface, or a heavily modified version of one, is not, which is exactly why so many major brands eventually commission one once they can afford it. It’s the same underlying logic covered in our best fonts for a logo guide, just taken to its natural conclusion: the more a brand’s identity is worth protecting, the more likely its type will end up custom rather than borrowed.